Home      Activities       Newsletter      Policy Brief      Services

Network for Social Accountability (NSA) 

Democratizing Debate on Development

 

 

 

 

Union Budget 2009-10

A Response

Section-2: Agriculture and Rural Employment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For full text in pdf format click here

 

Section-2

Agriculture and Rural Employment

 

Major Announcements Made

  • It is intended to move to a system of direct transfer of subsidy to the farmers in due course.

  • National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS): Allocation under NREGS increased by 144 per cent to Rs.39,100 crore in B.E. 2009-10 over B.E. 2008-09.

  • National Food Security Act: National Food Security Act to be brought in to ensure entitlement of 25 kilo of rice or wheat per month at Rs.3 per kilo to every family living below the poverty line in rural or urban areas.

As mentioned earlier, the total allocations for the head titled agriculture and allied activities registered a decline of around 23.3 percent in current year compared to the figures for the previous year. In nominal terms it has declined from around Rs. 139671 crores in 2008-09 RE to Rs. 107635 crores in 2009-10 BE. As percent of total government expenditure, it registered an increase from a modest 7.3 percent in 2004-05 to more than 15 percent in 2008-09 RE. However, this year the figure declined to 10.5 percent of total government expenditure indicating the fact that government is really not serious about what it says about maintaining a 4 percent growth in agriculture. It should however be remembered that the amount shown as allocations under agriculture and allied activities also include allocations towards food (Rs. 52490 crore in 2009-10) and fertilizer subsidy (Rs. 49980 crore in 2009-10). If one discounts these amount which is primarily for the purpose of providing welfare to the poor farmers[1] and consumers of PDS, then the real allocation for agriculture and allied activities comes down drastically.

Table-5

Allocations under the Head Agriculture and Allied Activities

 

 

Allocations for Agriculture and Allied Activities

A& A Activities as % of total Government Expenditure

A& A Activities as % of GDP

2000-01

19330.77

5.9

0.9

2001-02

25448.96

7.0

1.1

2002-03

30939.37

7.5

1.3

2003-04

32746.24

6.9

1.2

2004-05

36192.82

7.3

1.1

2005-06

37443.13

7.4

1.0

2006-07

48143.6

8.3

1.2

2007-08

68257.83

9.6

1.4

2008-09 RE

139670.8

15.5

2.6

2009-10 BE

107634.8

10.5

1.8

Table-6 provides item wise allocation trends under agriculture and allied activities. It can be clearly seen from the table below that apart from allocations under crop husbandry and food storage, on other counts the amount allocated is meager. In crop husbandry and food storage also, the amount allocated registered a quantum jump in 2008-09 primarily because of the fertilizer subsidy and the food subsidy amounts. The present year saw a decline in the crop husbandry section.

As mentioned earlier, not all the amount shown under these heads is for actual agricultural promotion purposes. As can be seen from Table-7, only less than 9 percent of the total allocations shown under revenue allocations for Agricultural and Allied Activities are directly for the purpose of agriculture development in the country (Table-7 and Figure-4). In the year 2009-10 BE, around 97 percent of the total non plan allocations for the head was for different purposes, many of which are not directly related to agriculture.

Table-6

Item wise allocation Trends under Agriculture and Allied Activities[2]

 

Crop Husbandry

Soil and Water Conser-

vation

Animal Husb-

Andry & Dairy Devp

Fisheries, Forestry and Wild Life

Plant-

ations

Food, Storage and Ware-

housing

Agri.  Rese-

arch and Edu-

cation

Agri Fina-

ncial Inst.

Co-oper-

ation

Other Agri Prog

2000-01

5087.8

33.7

198.2

187.6

199.7

12304.0

1264.1

6.1

28.2

21.4

2001-02

5687.5

10.1

215.8

232.3

199.5

17722.3

1274.3

29.7

32.7

45.0

2002-03

4331.0

7.6

214.1

352.9

270.8

24317.2

1299.0

30.5

30.5

85.8

2003-04

4608.5

10.4

260.5

409.2

415.8

25430.8

1435.7

27.4

42.4

105.6

2004-05

6785.8

10.1

352.7

448.3

580.3

26138.2

1588.3

65.6

66.2

157.5

2005-06

10449.6

14.1

444.7

511.0

430.1

23449.4

1875.1

35.5

96.4

137.3

2006-07

17209.9

14.2

656.8

592.5

310.0

24404.3

2065.8

2629.1

124.0

137.0

2007-08

28373.2

10.3

632.0

721.5

320.7

31882.7

2180.6

3828.1

80.8

228.1

2008-09RE

82837.5

13.2

751.1

703.5

352.6

44628.5

2781.2

7318.3

79.0

206.0

2009-10BE

45515.2

14.8

934.6

933.2

409.3

53446.7

3061.7

3056.0

79.0

184.4

Table-7

How much is really for Agriculture?

 

 

2008-09 RE

2009-10 BE

 

A

Plan

Non Plan

Total

Plan

Non Plan

Total

Total Allocation in Agriculture and Allied Activities

B

9267.35

112997.4

122264.7

8362.86

98894.73

107257.6

Amount allocated through Ministry of Agriculture

C

8302.44

1741.45

10043.89

7311.36

2121.87

9433.23

Amount allocated for Ministries other than agriculture and counted as allocations for Agriculture and Allied Activites

D

964.91

111255.9

112220.8

1051.5

96772.86

97824.36

Column-D as % of Column B

 

10.4

98.5

91.8

12.6

97.9

91.2

Details of Column B 

Ministry of Commerce for different boards like coffee,tea, spice, rubber boards 

301.24

51.4

352.64

290

119.33

409.33

Subsidy on Import of Pulses 

...

...

...

...

200

200

Food Storage and Warehousing 

3.12

44498.45

44501.57

4.8

53132.3

53137.1

Establishment expenditure on the O/o the Chief Directorate of Purchase 

...

2.68

2.68

...

3.18

3.18

Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife Eco-development Programme National Afforestation and other programmes 

498.1

48.97

547.07

516.05

61.46

577.51

International Cooperation under Ministry of Economic Affairs 

...

...

...

...

45.01

45.01

Agricultural Financial Institutions General Financial and Trading Institutions 

...

7318.25

7318.25

...

3011

3011

Assistance for infrastructure facilities for Mega Food Parks, Integrated Cold Chain Facility, Value Added Centres, Irradiation facilities and Establishment/ Modernization of Abattoirs under Ministry of Food Processing 

42

...

42

134.8

...

134.8

For modernisation of Rice Mills, Horticulture Based Industries, Grants for Milk Based Industries, Meat Food Product Order under Ministry of Food Processing 

120.45

3.77

124.22

105.85

0.58

106.43

Fertiliser Subsidy to Manufacturers and Traders of different fertilisers 

...

59332.38

59332.38

...

40200

40200

Figure-4

91 percent allocation for Agriculture and Allied Activities goes towards other purposes

Very cleverly, the finance minister mentions about 144 percent increase in allocations for NREGS over the budget estimates of 2008-09. When the budget estimates were prepared in 2008-09, government did not allocate any money for the expanded NREGS for 600 districts. The allocations for the expanded NREGS was made with effect from 1st April 2008 to the tune of around Rs. 30000 crores in addition to the provision of around 6740 crores towards the foodgrain component under Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojana in the revised estimates for 2008-09 making the allocations for the total rural employment generation programmes reach to the tune of Rs. 36750 crore for 2008-09 RE. This year, despite a promise of the government to increase the total number of employment days to be created under the programme by around 60 percent, the allocations for the programme have increased only by around 6.4 percent.

Table-8

Allocations under Rural Employment Generation Programmes

 

Rural Employment Programmes

Rural Employment as % of GDP

Amount under NREGS

 

Per District Allocation

Remarks

2004-05

7118.4

0.23

 

 

 

 

2005-06

12954.9

0.36

 

 

 

 

2006-07

29727.1

0.72

10170

200

50.85

For 100 days work

2007-08

16336.6

0.35

10800

330

32.73

For 100 days work

2008-09 RE

36750.2

0.69

30000

600

50.00

For 100 days work

2009-10 BE

39100.0

0.67

39100

600

65.17

For 160 days work

 

 


 

[1] Notwithstanding the fact that the fertilizer subsidy amount actually goes towards compensation towards producers and traders of fertilizers, such a subsidy makes the price of fertilizer affordable to a larger section of farmers in India.

[2] Taken from AFS

 

For fulltext in pdf format click here

 Go to Contents of Response on Union Budget 2009-10

Contact Us

Publications

Join our Mailing List

See What others Say about NSA

NSA Databases

NSA Advisory Board

Go to Policy Brief Contents Page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**********************

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© Quay Coordination Sbvervices (P) Ltd.    Associated Website<http://www.nsa.org.in>